I'd take a look at the Microsoft SQL Server 2000
operations guide - as it has reccommendations for creating
a performance baseline..
Take a look at :-
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?
url=/technet/prodtechnol/sql/maintain/operate/opsguide/sqlo
ps5.asp
and look for 'Creating The Baseline - Suggested Counters'
Hope this helps.
quote:
>--Original Message--
>We are in the process of bringing a new SQL Cluster into
production. One of
quote:
>the things we are insisting on is that we have
appropriate performance
quote:
>monitoring in place BEFORE our customers start using it.
>Briefly, the cluster is twin quad xeons, expandable to
eight processors. 8
quote:
>gig ram expandable to 64. Fiber channel to a drive array,
log files to a
quote:
>separate array. The cluster is an ASP environment.
Customers access the
quote:
>database server through a load balanced Citrix farm. The
expectation is to
quote:
>go from about 100 customers to over 1000 in the next 24
months, partly
quote:
>through aquiring new customers and partly through moving
existing customers
quote:
>to the ASP model. Each customer has a separate set of
databases. The obvious
quote:
>problem is that performance is maintianed as new
customers are added. The
quote:
>monitoring plan is to take a baseline set of readings
with no load on the
quote:
>new cluster, then take data at prescribed intervals so
that we can project
quote:
>utilization and adjust planned upgrades accordingly. All
standard procedure
quote:
>(or at least it should be, right?).
>My question is, that if you had the opportunity to set up
such monitoring on
quote:
>a pristine system, what would you include? We are
currently going to look at
quote:Thanks Steve.
>the following:
>Logical Disk:
> Avg Queue Length
> Current Disk Queue
>Physical Disk
> Avg Queue Length
> Current Disk Queue
>Memory
> Pages/sec
> Page Reads/sec
> Page Faults/sec
>System
> Processor Queue Length
> CPU %
>SQL:
> Cache Hit Ratio
> I/O - Single Page Write/Sec
> I/O - Page Reads/Sec
> I/O - Transactions/Sec
> User Connections
>
>What would you add or remove from this list?
>
>Thanks,
>Bob Castleman
>SuccessWare SoftWare
>
>.
>
Unfortunately, the info at the link you provided is pretty generic. I guess
I'm looking for specifics based on the experiences of the experts that post
here.
"Steve Hindmarsh" <steve@.nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:019f01c3db96$3e331ba0$a401280a@.phx.gbl...[QUOTE]
> Bob,
> I'd take a look at the Microsoft SQL Server 2000
> operations guide - as it has reccommendations for creating
> a performance baseline..
> Take a look at :-
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?
> url=/technet/prodtechnol/sql/maintain/operate/opsguide/sqlo
> ps5.asp
> and look for 'Creating The Baseline - Suggested Counters'
> Hope this helps.
>
> production. One of
> appropriate performance
> eight processors. 8
> log files to a
> Customers access the
> expectation is to
> months, partly
> existing customers
> databases. The obvious
> customers are added. The
> with no load on the
> that we can project
> standard procedure
> such monitoring on
> currently going to look at
No comments:
Post a Comment